At the beginning of 2005, China`s exports of textiles and clothing to the West increased by 100% or more in many respects, leading the United States and the EU to highlight China`s WTO accession agreements, which allowed them to limit the growth rate to 7.5% per year until 2008. In June, China agreed with the EU to limit the rate to 10% for three years. No such agreement was reached with the United States, which reported its own import growth rate of 7.5%. [Citation required] Under the multifibre agreement, the United States and the European Union (EU) have restricted imports from developing countries to protect their domestic textile industry. As part of the agreement, quotas (limited in numerical numbers) were allocated to each country that signed certain items that could be exported to the United States and the EU. (Note that at the beginning of the agreement, the EU did not exist in its current form; the agreement included the European Community at the time (EC) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). Macro-financial assistance was introduced in 1974 as a short-term measure to enable industrialized countries to adapt to imports from developing countries. Developing countries and countries that do not have a welfare state have a comparative advantage in textile production because they are labour-intensive and their poor social security systems allow them low labour costs.  According to a study by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the system has cost developing countries 27 million jobs and $40 billion in lost exports per year.  Developing countries have opposed measures such as a social clause in customs agreements to make them conditional on improving working conditions. The number of signatories to the agreement has changed slightly over time, but has generally exceeded 40, with the EC considered one of the signatories. Trade between these countries dominated the world trade in clothing and textiles, with a share of up to 80%. The agreement was concluded for the first time under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).
Origins (1) recognized both the threat to developed markets of imports of cheap clothing and textiles in terms of market disruptions and the impact on their own producers, and (2) the importance of such exports to developing countries for their own economic development and as a means of diversifying export earnings. The uruguay Round (UR) draft closing deed provides for a 10-year exit from all AMF and other quotas for textiles in ATC. The AMF is extended until the EC comes into force. A five-year agreement was reached with Japan on limiting textile exports to the United States. Meanwhile, GATT has been supplanted by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Uruguay-GATT has decided to transfer surveillance of world textile trade to the WTO. This round of negotiations has also resulted in the abolition of quotas for the world trade in clothing and textiles. The trial ended on 1 January 2005, marking the end of the MfA. The agreement helped to protect industries in developed economies as planned, but also helped boost textile production in some countries where quotas did allow them access to access they did not previously have. The European Economic Community and the United States conclude bilateral agreements with developing countries before agreeing to the extension of the AMF. The United Kingdom signs similar restriction agreements with India and Pakistan.